![\"Watchmen](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.xjaymanx.com\/xjaymanx_2007\/Images-toybox-2009\/xjaymanx_0211_watchmen_0003_5800.jpg\" "\\"Watchmen")
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 5800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
Hello-hello! Welcome back, folks, friends, and fellow Toyboxers! Are we there yet? Is it time for another weekly mega-odyssey into medieval mayhem? Of course, why else would we be here? This week, our mega-cast catapults us into the far-reaching heights of the blogging otakusphere, ricochets through the wildfiery depths of the watchful anti-hero underground, and crash-lands into a rowdy crowd of indie-film partiers. Yeah, just another normal week, lol. What else is new? So sit back, relax, crack open a can, and let our broadcast take control…<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Part 1 of 5 > Moe, Otaku Outlook & Featured Posts of the Week<\/h2>\n
Otaku Outlook.<\/b><\/i> Moe! Otaku! Posts! First of all, let’s start the show with our latest look at the otaku blogosphere. If you’ve been following the “otaku blog battles” for the last few months, you should be somewhat familiar with the general trends flowing since April’s Supercops<\/a> (Blog 198, Part 1) to May’s Tales<\/a> (Blog 202, Parts 1-2) to June’s Angels<\/a> (Blog 207, Part 7) mega-cast. Consequently, here’s the latest “otakuspheric” batch of estimated theoretical values, according to Website Outlook<\/a>.<\/p>\n As you can easily see in the first chart, “Sankaku Complex” yet again continues to mega-shred the otakusphere while “Danny Choo” continues to float weightlessly in a pilot-less Gundam, lol. Feel free to enlarge the chart. While it’s taking longer than anticipated, my Tales<\/a> (May 2009) question still remains: Will \u201cSankaku Complex\u201d finally double the theoretical value of \u201cDanny Choo\u201d?<\/i><\/p>\n Okay, as always, let\u2019s omit the \u201cSankaku Complex\u201d and \u201cDanny Choo\u201d paths to get a closer view of the smaller mortal blogs. Again, feel free to enlarge. Luckily, it looks like almost all of the otaku blogs across-the-board have either stayed level or rose in value. Yup, I think we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief, lol. Based on these specific trajectories, the overall otakusphere seems to be generally stable, if not healthy. Congratulations! With special congrats to “Happy Soda” who still manages to reign the theoretical $10K-to-20K range!<\/p>\n Ah, now let\u2019s focus on the theoretical $0K-to-3K range. Do you remember who won our little “race” last month? Yup, Duckie-chan<\/a> won, lol. So who’s our theoretical $0K-to-3K winner this month? Well, if we can trust Website Outlook, our winner is: Coco-chan<\/a>! Congratulations, Coco-chan! Like with Duckie-chan, we don\u2019t know what prize you\u2019ve actually won, but we\u2019ll figure it out eventually, lol. <\/p>\n Remember, my Titanic Toyboxers, once your otaku-blog exceeds an estimated worth of $3K, it no longer qualifies for this little “race”. Just to keep it interesting, hehe. So there it is. Good luck, next month! Now from our general otaku outlook, let’s leap to “moe”.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Japanese Moe.<\/b><\/i> Moe! Otaku! Posts! Second of all, what does the Japanese term moe<\/a> mean? Here’s one definition according to Wikipedia.<\/p>\n Moe<\/a> (\/mo.e\/, pronounced “mo-eh” literally “budding”, as with a plant) is a Japanese slang word originally referring to a strong interest in particular types of character in video games or anime and manga. For example, meganekko-moe<\/i>, “glasses-girl moe<\/i>“, describes a person who is attracted to fictional characters with eyeglasses. “Moe!”<\/i> is also used within anime fandom as an interjection referring to a character the speaker considers to be a moekko<\/i>. It is even used in some anime, such as Ouran High School Host Club<\/i>, Ai Kora<\/i>, Lucky Star<\/i>, Kaichou-wa Maid-sama!<\/i>, and K-On!<\/i>. There are various interpretations of what moe<\/i> is today. Joseph L. Dela Pena argues that moe<\/i> is a pure, protective feeling towards a character.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Hmm, what does the term mean to me? To me, to restate the above definition in my own words, “moe” can be likened to the word “cute”, especially as it applies to cute girls. But perhaps a fonder, more emotional or more protective form of “cute”. Something like that, lol. So why am I bringing up the term “moe”? Well, we’ll see in the following featured posts of the week!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Featured Otaku.<\/b><\/i> Moe! Otaku! Posts! Wow, it’s been a while since my last “Featured Otaku Posts of the Week”! Well, the wait is over, hehe. Here’s my latest batch of “Featured Otaku” since April’s Supercops<\/a> (Blog 198, Part 4), May’s Redheads<\/a> (Blog 201, Part 1) and Succubi<\/a> (Blog 203, Part 2), and June’s Shikaku<\/a> (Blog 204, Part 1).<\/p>\n Let’s begin with Otaku Dan’s post “The Anime That Defines The Decade<\/a>” (14 July 2009).<\/p>\n So what was Otaku Dan’s ultimate choice? Sadly, he chose “Gurren Lagann” (5 of 5 stars), lol. Not that it’s a bad anime. In fact, it’s a great one. But it’s not quite one that “defined the decade”. Inevitably, alternative choices flooded the scene. Here’s a couple by the notoriously Angry Mimi-chan<\/a>.<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: It definitely has to be “Suzumiya Haruhi no Yuuutsu”. Haruhi changed the anime world so much, in so many ways. Haruhi was the first to start the online (and everywhere else) dance trend, which now continues on in other anime. She brought tsundere to a different level, and started a religion. <\/p>\n My runner up would be “Code Geass”, which brought Nietzsche and every other type of philosophy into an anime that had sex-appeal, mecha, comedy, and strategy. CLAMP = geniuses.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n While Angry Mimi-chan’s choices of “Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya” (4 of 5 stars<\/a> max for a short season) and “Code Geass” (5 of 5 stars<\/a>) are both outstanding contenders, I have to disagree. I mean, “outstanding” isn’t necessary the same as “defining”. Although “Haruhi” undeniably comes close! Alas, here’s my choice.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Densha-Dan: Great question. Although I think you missed the mark. “Gundam” is obviously a contender alongside “Mazinger” for the 70’s. But clearly, mecha ruled. Next, while the film “Akira” definitely caught American audiences, can’t forget the “Robotech” series for that same reason in the 80’s. Ah, then the 90’s saw the likes of Mamoru Oshii (Ghost in the Shell), Hideaki Anno (Evangelion), and Hayao Miyazaki (Nausicaa), so any of their masterpieces could qualify, lol. At this point, it wasn’t simply mecha anymore, lol. But for the 00’s? That’s pretty tough. Was there truly a masterpiece? <\/p>\n Well, if a studio ruled above all else, it would probably be Kyoto Animation. Not only with their “Haruhi”, “Lucky Star”, “Air” and “Kanon” hits, but probably their flagship series “Clannad” as well. Not mecha at all! But rather, based on a dating-sim visual novel. And if any genre defined the 00’s, it wasn’t mecha-related. Alas, if the growth of “Sankaku Complex” is any indication, it would probably be related to moe, an eroge, or a dating-sim, wouldn’t it? In that light, “Clannad” takes the title of “Anime That Defined the Decade”. A decade of moe, eroge and girls-girls-girls, lol. So far.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So what do you think? Does “Clannad” (5 of 5 stars<\/a>) define the “moe and eroge” decade?<\/p>\n Next, let’s visit Angry Mimi-chan’s post “80% Akiyama Mio Cosplay Goodness<\/a>” (14 July 2009).<\/p>\n While it isn’t a terribly intellectual post, it’s still a rather adorable one. Oops, I meant “moe”, lol. Here’s our brief exchange. Including my goofy final pun on the “K-On!” ending-theme song.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Heyyy, here\u2019s my 80% congrats!\u2026 Honestly, I agree with a couple of comments above. You look like a different girl each-and-every post, especially from each-and-every angle, lol. Boggling. >_<;\n\n\n\n Mimi<\/a>: Thanks!! Yeah I\u2019m tired of looking different :\u2019P Am trying to take better pics recently. ^^;;;<\/p>\n Btw i stored all of my figures, including Haruhi, in my basement ^^;;;;;;;;;;; which is why THAT post is taking sooooo long ;_____;<\/p>\n Stupid lazy me\u2026<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Awww\u2026 \u201cPlease don\u2019t say you are lazy\u201d, lol.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Next comes Angry Mimi-chan’s post “If You Were a Girl For a Day<\/a>” (14 July 2009).<\/p>\n Hahaha, while the topic isn’t shockingly new, it’s still definitely one of the more mind-boggling (and body-boggling) questions: What would you do if you were the opposite gender for a day?<\/i><\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: LOL, ummm, let\u2019s see\u2026 (1) Hire you for some wardrobe advice, then (2) walk into a bar of hot lesbians?<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: Oh i forgot you\u2019d still be attracted to females ^^;<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Haha, interesting point! Would my attraction change for a day too? Gahhh. >o<;\n\n\n\n Altair.Hashan<\/a>: so then when u turn back does it make you gay if you slept with a man? xP<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: lol i don\u2019t think so since you were a girl..<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: That\u2019s why it\u2019d be \u201csafer\u201d to find hot lesbians, lol.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: So now, I think it\u2019s time to turn it around\u2026 What would you do if *you* were a guy for a day? Don\u2019t hold back, lol. ^_~<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: I\u2019d win a piano competition and experience the sheer joy of being a man for a day ^^ … nahh I\u2019d just masturbate all day ^^;<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Awww, lol, that\u2019s it? All day? I mean, I can name a couple things that\u2019d probably feel better than that, lol.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Hahaha, next is Angry Mimi-chan’s post “Angry Mimi Dot Com 1st Birthday (+ Q&A)<\/a>” (17 July 2009).<\/p>\n Congrats, Angry Mimi-chan! Although technically, while your original “Angry Loli @ Blogger” blog was created one year ago, your current WordPress-based “Angry Mimi Dot Com” hasn’t reached one year yet. Just an observation, lol. And now the “Question and Answer” session.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Oops, I better add that note to your \u201cMimi\u2019s Rage\u201d Facebook group! But rest assured, for the past year, you\u2019ve been one of the livelier colors in the otakuspheric rainbow. Awww. So let\u2019s see. Questions, questions, questions\u2026<\/p>\n 1> If you traveled faster than the speed of sound and approached the speed of light, would Mozart\u2019s \u201cRequiem\u201d still be an auditory masterpiece? Why or why not?<\/p>\n 2> If a composer could mathematically translate the human genetic code into a symphony of music notes, would that symphony be a masterpiece? Why or why not?<\/p>\n 3> If your blog had never survived the first 6 months, where would you be, and what would be doing, right now? If one isn\u2019t satisfactory, then the three most probable outcomes, lol.<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: Oh eff I have to leave seriously right now so uhm Jay those are too confusing I don\u2019t like comprehend fast enough >.< K see you next week. I really have to go (to a far away place for some fun business that\u2019s a secret but will tell when the time comes). : P\n\n\n\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Heyyy, no worries. Though a \u201cconfused\u201d answer would\u2019ve been just as illuminating and amusing as a \u201ccomprehending\u201d one, lol. Good luck on your secret-spy trip! ^_~<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: Ok Jay here are my attempts!<\/p>\n 1) Uhh sure, although I have no clue what Mozart\u2019s Requiem sounds like because I\u2019m less musically adept. :\u2019D<\/p>\n 2) Yeah it would, cuz it would be quite popular.<\/p>\n 3) Hmm. 1. On Nico Nico Douga. 2. On SanCom. 3. On DC.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Hehe, nice!<\/p>\n 1> Clue: Ahh, but would you still be able to enjoy music if you traveled faster than music? Double clue: If a tree falls in a forest, yada yada, lol.<\/p>\n 2> Really? Isn\u2019t it possible that our \u201chuman genetic symphony\u201d might sound like an insane \u201cNico Nico Douga\u201d video? Nooooo! ^o^<\/p>\n 3> So basically, no change, haha. >_<;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Confused yet? Hahaha, finally, here’s Angry Mimi-chan’s post “Angry Mimi Signs<\/a>” (18 July 2009).<\/p>\n Of course, I couldn’t resist a good musical challenge! After a few listens to Angry Mimi-chan’s masterful piano performance, I wandered a bit through YouTube to try to confirm my suspicions, lol. While I felt good about the composer, I couldn’t verify the exact piece. So I had to go with my gut below!<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Hmmm, intriguing game! Will you collect responses before approving them? Or will you let other commenters see previous guesses? Whoa, I gotta admit, when I heard the 2nd half of this “mystery piece”, certain themes felt like Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody #2! Very similar!<\/p>\n So based on my limited knowledge, I’ll guess Liszt. If I had to guess further, it’s probably one of the 19 Rhapsodies? ^_~;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n To my surprise, since she hadn’t moderated my comment as other comments appeared, I must’ve guessed right! Right?<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: We actually have one winner so far. Just fyi.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: {Innocent eyes, feigned surprise} Whoa! What? So soon?<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: Someone here is quite musically adept. ^^ I\u2019m surprised.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: {Tilted head, raised eyebrow} Hehe, I wouldn\u2019t know. But I probably wouldn\u2019t be surprised who the \u201cangry influence\u201d is.<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: Haha.. wait, really? O.o<\/p>\n Mimi<\/a>: To the person who got it right.. I still can\u2019t believe it. If I hadn\u2019t learned this piece, I never would\u2019ve guessed THAT closely to the actual piece. That was so seriously close! :\u2019O!!<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: LOL, why? I thought you were the virtuoso. Must\u2019ve been a \u201cperfect storm\u201d of passion, perception and coincidence.<\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Hahaha, okay, you don\u2019t have to moderate this comment yet either, since I can see that my first one is still being held, lol. But it\u2019s a pretty winding and amusing story. The 1st seed was back in January when you were trying out for the YouTube Symphony Orchestra. I mean, I played some piano as a teen. But somehow I found myself analyzing your \u201cWaldstein\u201d piece, lol. The 2nd seed was probably in April. I don\u2019t know how, whether it was random YouTube searches, or if you mentioned Liszt in your blog posts, but something made me add \u201cHungary Rhapsody #2\u2033 to my Pandora.com Radio Stations on April 7th, haha. Shortly thereafter, I watched the YouTube Symphony Orchestra performed on April 15-16th. Then the following week, you mentioned Liszt in your April 22nd post \u201cWhy why why do you blog?\u201d. So it\u2019s possible that you might\u2019ve mentioned Liszt earlier, between January and April. In any case, it stuck in my brain that he was one of your favorite composers, lol. But here\u2019s the funny thing, when I heard \u201cHungary Rhapsody #2\u2033 again, it was something I already recognized as a kid! One of those old Looney Tune cartoons with Bugs Bunny or Tom & Jerry where the occasional story revolved around classical music. But I never knew what it was called or who composed it. I mean, I haven\u2019t listened to classical music in years. At least, not regularly, not since college. Until earlier this year, lol\u2026 In other words, if you had never tried out for the YouTube Orchestra, I never would\u2019ve guessed who wrote this \u201cmystery piece\u201d. Hahaha, such a strange world.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Then finally, in Angry Mimi-chan’s next-day post “All Your Mudkips Are Belong To Me! A Mudkip Miracle<\/a>” (19 July 2009), she announced the winners.<\/p>\n P.S. The winners are Jay and unellmay who both guessed \u201cFranz Liszt.\u201d Jay was closer than even I would have been had I never learned that piece, with a more-specific guess of \u201cHungarian Rhapsody #2.\u201d I\u2019m impressed beyond words. Franz Liszt\u2019s Hungarian Fantasy (or Fantasy on Hungarian Themes) is actually based on a Hungarian Rhapsody. :\u2019O!! So there you go. Congrats you two! ^__^<\/p>\n P.P.S. I\u2019m gone this entire week but will be back on Sunday to make signs and throw some PMS into this blog. <\/p>\n xJAYMANx<\/a>: @Mimi-chan: Gahhh, so damn close I could taste it. And thanx! Yeah, I was hoping it was one of the later “Hungarian Rhapsodies”, but I’d definitely welcome a sign based on a “Hungarian Fantasy”. Who wouldn’t? Especially if it resembles your top “80% Mio” pic, lol. Mudkips and PMS not included.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Whew. That was a mega-ton of Japanese moe, Hungarian music, and Angry Mimi-chan! But enough about anime and otaku, let’s hyper-leap from angry teens to aging anti-heroes, lol.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ahh, “Watchmen”. Before we dive into the 2009 film, let’s flashback to my ancient mini-cast “Blog 115 > Who Watches the Watchmen?<\/a>” (28 October 2007). Here’s one of the first posters that appeared back in 2007.<\/p>\n Here’s what I wrote back then.<\/p>\n Wow. A couple months ago, on August 26th, 2007, an email subscription sent me an eye-popping article<\/a> on the “Watchmen” movie coming in 2009! For those of you who know the title, you know what I mean! … When I first read the award-winning “Watchmen” comic<\/a> back around ’87-’89, I was immediately drawn in and amazed by the violence, psychology and complexity of a world where superheroes grew middle-aged and cynical. Not only that, but the symbolism — especially of the watch — within the comic and how frames seemed to meld from one to the next definitely made an impression on me. I think this was the first time I was exposed to such darkness in comics, manga or anime. And coming in 2009, I new “Watchmen” CG film will hope to live up to the highest expectations!… Below, here are 6 photos of the old “Watchmen” comic<\/a> I’ve kept since high-school…\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Awesome, huh? Here are the 6 photos I mentioned.<\/p>\n Ten to midnight!<\/p>\n A peek at Chapter IV.<\/p>\n Four to midnight!<\/p>\n A peek at Chapter IX.<\/p>\n Another bloody angle.<\/p>\n Now that we’ve flashed back for a tangy taste of the “Watchmen” past, let’s flash forward for a spicier spoon of the “Watchmen” present, lol. Are you ready?<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Like I mentioned above, I’ve known about the oncoming “Watchmen<\/a>” (2009) film since 2007. Then in March 2009, it finally premiered. Well, just a little over a week ago, on Sunday, 12 July 2009, I finally found the time to watch it! And guess what? It’s freakin’ good! Once again, I was “amazed by the violence, psychology and complexity of a world where superheroes grew middle-aged and cynical”. If I had never read the original comic<\/a>, I’d definitely give this film at least 3 of 5 stars, if not 4 of 5 stars (which is my “official” rating, hehe). But having actually read the comic, this faithful film also deserves 5 of 5 stars in the eyes of its comic-book fans! An outstanding and blazing adaptation! To celebrate its epic anti-heroic glory, here are over 30 of the “biggest and baddest” high-res posters, wallpapers, and other images from the “Watchmen” film. Be warned! And enjoy!<\/p>\n Ah, one of the signature scenes from the comic and film.<\/p>\n An early poster of the intense cast.<\/p>\n The international poster at 5800px. Notice the muscular enhancement of Dr. Manhattan?<\/p>\n Next, the Spanish version. Quien vigila? (Who’s watching?)<\/p>\n A lone mask in an unmasked city. At 5500px.<\/p>\n Another version of the city. Notice the replaced “elephant” blimp?<\/p>\n The Romanian poster. The same unmasked city. The same intense cast.<\/p>\n The music album cover. Again, Dr. Manhattan is slightly different from the above.<\/p>\n An awesome up-close IMAX version.<\/p>\n The stunning cover of “Entertainment Weekly”.<\/p>\n Next, here are some vivid 3600px snapshots of the individual characters. The Comedian.<\/p>\n Rorschach.<\/p>\n Nite Owl.<\/p>\n Silk Spectre.<\/p>\n Dr. Manhattan.<\/p>\n Ozymandias.<\/p>\n Next, here are some intense 1920px wallpapers of the cast. Again, the Comedian.<\/p>\n Rorschach.<\/p>\n Nite Owl.<\/p>\n Silk Spectre.<\/p>\n Dr. Manhattan.<\/p>\n Ozymandias.<\/p>\n Haha, even more 1920px wallpapers of the cast. The Comedian at war.<\/p>\n Rorschach on the street.<\/p>\n Nite Owl under the ground.<\/p>\n Silk Spectre under fire.<\/p>\n Dr. Manhattan on Mars.<\/p>\n
\n18 July | Website Outlook \u2013 Blog Worth Over Time | Enlarge 800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\n18 July | Website Outlook \u2013 Blog Worth Over Time | Enlarge 800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\n18 July | Website Outlook \u2013 Blog Worth Over Time | Enlarge 800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\n\n
\n
\n14 July | Otaku Dan – The Anime That Defines The Decade | Enlarge 2200px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n\n
\n
\nClannad (2007) & Clannad After Story (2008) | Enlarge 1600px Wallpaper<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\n14 July | Angry Mimi – 80% Akiyama Mio Cosplay Goodness | Enlarge 2200px <\/em><\/a><\/div>\n\n
\n14 July | Angry Mimi – If You Were a Girl For a Day | Enlarge 2200px <\/em><\/a><\/div>\n\n
\n17 July | Angry Mimi – Angry Mimi Dot Com 1st Birthday | Enlarge 2200px <\/em><\/a><\/div>\n\n
\n18 July | Angry Mimi – Angry Mimi Signs | Enlarge 2200px <\/em><\/a><\/div>\n\n
\n
\n
Part 2 of 5 > Watchmen – 2007 Flashback<\/h2>\n
\nWatchmen (Poster, 2007) | Enlarge 750px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n\n
\nWatchmen (Comic, 1986-1987) | Enlarge 750px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Comic, 1986-1987) | Enlarge 750px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Comic, 1986-1987) | Enlarge 750px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Comic, 1986-1987) | Enlarge 750px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Comic, 1986-1987) | Enlarge 750px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Comic, 1986-1987) | Enlarge 750px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\nPart 3 of 5 > Watchmen – 2009 Film<\/h2>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3300px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3000px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 5800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009, Spain) | Enlarge 2800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 5500px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 2800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009, Romania) | Enlarge 2800px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1400px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 2200px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3100px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3600px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3600px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3600px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3600px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3600px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 3600px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n
\nWatchmen (Film, 2009) | Enlarge 1900px<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n