<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog 204 &gt; Sankaku-Shikaku Otakulypse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/</link>
	<description>Never forget how to play...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:37:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xjaymanx</title>
		<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/comment-page-1/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>xjaymanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/?p=3095#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>@A20-san: Well, I never said that such &quot;expansion&quot; was ever easy or without consequences, eh? Haha, if u ever saw &quot;Noein&quot;, a particle collider might eventually blow a hole through the center of our world, if not our parallel reality! Not much time for the luxury of sanity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@A20-san: Well, I never said that such &#8220;expansion&#8221; was ever easy or without consequences, eh? Haha, if u ever saw &#8220;Noein&#8221;, a particle collider might eventually blow a hole through the center of our world, if not our parallel reality! Not much time for the luxury of sanity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aprilius20</title>
		<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>aprilius20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/?p=3095#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>Yup, but such &#039;expansion&#039; ultimately ends up imploding upon itself... you just return to your &#039;pre-expansion&#039; borders, say, after disconnecting from the net or finishing that conversation. Something radical might work, I suppose, but by &#039;violently breaking&#039; such things one often ends up broken as well, haha. Speaking of Einstein&#039;s theories, I&#039;m still hoping that the &#039;Large Hadron Collider&#039; will throw something new into the mix^-^
[rq=1511,0,blog][/rq]&lt;a href=&quot;http://aprilius20.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/a-bit-of-may-and-june-screaming-utter-randomness/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A bit of May and June, Screaming Utter Randomness&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, but such &#8216;expansion&#8217; ultimately ends up imploding upon itself&#8230; you just return to your &#8216;pre-expansion&#8217; borders, say, after disconnecting from the net or finishing that conversation. Something radical might work, I suppose, but by &#8216;violently breaking&#8217; such things one often ends up broken as well, haha. Speaking of Einstein&#8217;s theories, I&#8217;m still hoping that the &#8216;Large Hadron Collider&#8217; will throw something new into the mix^-^<br />
<span class="cluv">aprilius20´s last blog &gt; <a href="http://aprilius20.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/a-bit-of-may-and-june-screaming-utter-randomness/" rel="nofollow">A bit of May and June, Screaming Utter Randomness</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xjaymanx</title>
		<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/comment-page-1/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>xjaymanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/?p=3095#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>@A20-man: Ah, that makes sense. Like learning to add before multiplying, or learning a few words of a new language before speaking it fluently. If one must be confined within one&#039;s consciousness, then the solution is to expand one&#039;s consciousness, right? Via internet, travel, conversation, art, etc. Unfortunately, it might be quicker to do so by violently breaking the rules and laws of society, religion and common sense. I mean, the Relativity and Quantum theories are quite a break from Newton&#039;s common sense, aren&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@A20-man: Ah, that makes sense. Like learning to add before multiplying, or learning a few words of a new language before speaking it fluently. If one must be confined within one&#8217;s consciousness, then the solution is to expand one&#8217;s consciousness, right? Via internet, travel, conversation, art, etc. Unfortunately, it might be quicker to do so by violently breaking the rules and laws of society, religion and common sense. I mean, the Relativity and Quantum theories are quite a break from Newton&#8217;s common sense, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aprilius20</title>
		<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/comment-page-1/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>aprilius20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/?p=3095#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>Haha, yup, you&#039;ve drifted slightly North-East, but we&#039;re still on course, no worries. In fact that last bit seems rather like a theory I remember from Kara no Kyoukai- where humans need to be confined within their consciousness to remain human, or something like that.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;aprilius20´s last blog post &gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://aprilius20.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/a-bit-of-may-and-june-screaming-utter-randomness/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A bit of May and June, Screaming Utter Randomness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, yup, you&#8217;ve drifted slightly North-East, but we&#8217;re still on course, no worries. In fact that last bit seems rather like a theory I remember from Kara no Kyoukai- where humans need to be confined within their consciousness to remain human, or something like that.</p>
<p><abbr><em>aprilius20´s last blog post &gt; <a href="http://aprilius20.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/a-bit-of-may-and-june-screaming-utter-randomness/" rel="nofollow">A bit of May and June, Screaming Utter Randomness</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xjaymanx</title>
		<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>xjaymanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/?p=3095#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>@A20-man: LOL, good point. But if there&#039;s no &quot;inside&quot;, there&#039;s no &quot;outside&quot; either. Just think of it as &quot;spilling liquid&quot; onto an infinite floor. There&#039;s no point in drinking something off the floor, is there? LOL... Ahh, the only way that would work is if *everyone* becomes *famous*. Andy Warhol&#039;s 15-minute comment, right? Then *nobody* would be *famous*... True, sanity is indeed a matter of social perception. As u narrow your pool of individual perceptions, your relative &quot;sanity&quot; would shift accordingly. Of course, that applies to your relative &quot;brains&quot; or &quot;beauty&quot; within a class, a school, a city, or the entire world. In terms of convenience, one&#039;s &quot;bubble of sanity&quot; would probably be a one-hour radius (driving, biking, or walking). In that case, a farmer&#039;s &quot;sanity&quot; in the middle of nowhere would be totally different from a city dweller&#039;s &quot;sanity&quot;... Yeah, I think I&#039;m drifting wayyy off course...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@A20-man: LOL, good point. But if there&#8217;s no &#8220;inside&#8221;, there&#8217;s no &#8220;outside&#8221; either. Just think of it as &#8220;spilling liquid&#8221; onto an infinite floor. There&#8217;s no point in drinking something off the floor, is there? LOL&#8230; Ahh, the only way that would work is if *everyone* becomes *famous*. Andy Warhol&#8217;s 15-minute comment, right? Then *nobody* would be *famous*&#8230; True, sanity is indeed a matter of social perception. As u narrow your pool of individual perceptions, your relative &#8220;sanity&#8221; would shift accordingly. Of course, that applies to your relative &#8220;brains&#8221; or &#8220;beauty&#8221; within a class, a school, a city, or the entire world. In terms of convenience, one&#8217;s &#8220;bubble of sanity&#8221; would probably be a one-hour radius (driving, biking, or walking). In that case, a farmer&#8217;s &#8220;sanity&#8221; in the middle of nowhere would be totally different from a city dweller&#8217;s &#8220;sanity&#8221;&#8230; Yeah, I think I&#8217;m drifting wayyy off course&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aprilius20</title>
		<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/comment-page-1/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>aprilius20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/?p=3095#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>Haha, I wonder how you&#039;d pour something inside it when there is no inside^^; But to become so famous that you become anonymous? That reminds me of the issue of branding, when brands become &#039;more than just a brand&#039;, like google, which is now a, what, verb? The opposite isn&#039;t much of an issue for me, though. The two pandora&#039;s boxes of the internet, 2chan or 4chan, demonstrate this concept pretty well.

As for insanity/sanity, that sounds a lot like a matter of perception... back into the &#039;what is reality&#039; argument, haha. For the sake of simplicity, let&#039;s divide reality into two- private and public. I suppose that for the former (sane to insane), you gradually ignore public reality&#039;, which would be something like the example in Chaos;Head: If everyone says your ice-cream is blue, it&#039;s blue, regardless of whether it&#039;s actually turquoise. So for &#039;sane to insane&#039; you gradually go mad in your self-righteousness, believing in your sanity so much that you think everyone else is bonkers, and vice versa. 

I&#039;m probably sounding rather incoherent at the moment, but I think I&#039;ll attribute that to lack of sleep and not having had breakfast yet. Better stop before it gets any worse, but you get my drift, I hope?

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;aprilius20´s last blog post &gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://aprilius20.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/a-bit-of-may-and-june-screaming-utter-randomness/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A bit of May and June, Screaming Utter Randomness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I wonder how you&#8217;d pour something inside it when there is no inside^^; But to become so famous that you become anonymous? That reminds me of the issue of branding, when brands become &#8216;more than just a brand&#8217;, like google, which is now a, what, verb? The opposite isn&#8217;t much of an issue for me, though. The two pandora&#8217;s boxes of the internet, 2chan or 4chan, demonstrate this concept pretty well.</p>
<p>As for insanity/sanity, that sounds a lot like a matter of perception&#8230; back into the &#8216;what is reality&#8217; argument, haha. For the sake of simplicity, let&#8217;s divide reality into two- private and public. I suppose that for the former (sane to insane), you gradually ignore public reality&#8217;, which would be something like the example in Chaos;Head: If everyone says your ice-cream is blue, it&#8217;s blue, regardless of whether it&#8217;s actually turquoise. So for &#8217;sane to insane&#8217; you gradually go mad in your self-righteousness, believing in your sanity so much that you think everyone else is bonkers, and vice versa. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably sounding rather incoherent at the moment, but I think I&#8217;ll attribute that to lack of sleep and not having had breakfast yet. Better stop before it gets any worse, but you get my drift, I hope?</p>
<p><abbr><em>aprilius20´s last blog post &gt; <a href="http://aprilius20.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/a-bit-of-may-and-june-screaming-utter-randomness/" rel="nofollow">A bit of May and June, Screaming Utter Randomness</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xjaymanx</title>
		<link>http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/2009/06/02/blog-204-sankaku-shikaku-otakulypse/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>xjaymanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xjaymanx.com/toyboxx/?p=3095#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>@Coco-chan: Ahh, interesting. Didn&#039;t know Japanese Dollfie collectors all referred to their dolls as &quot;daughters&quot;. Hmm, whether or not the connotation is different, as the Dollfie community continues to expand, should I begin to call my anime figures &quot;daughters&quot; too? Hehe, like I told Jenn-chan immediately above, if not &quot;daughters&quot;, couldn&#039;t I call them &quot;sisters&quot; too?... Haha, yeah, recycled articles are always confusing. Referring to them as past articles is okay, but don&#039;t need to automatically alter the date every year, lol... Ah, true, if u visit and know Melonpan more than the occasional visitor, you&#039;d probably know it was a prank. But as I&#039;ve noted before, with &quot;doll daughters&quot; and &quot;figure drilling&quot;, more and more shocking stuff is getting more and more acceptable. Which could be okay. Or not-so-okay, lol... Yup, I agree, the line between &quot;doll&quot; and &quot;figure&quot; definitely seems arbitrary, according to social norms and perceptions. So far, &quot;clothing&quot; and &quot;dressing up&quot; seem to be the sharpest distinction. But with these emerging Dollfies, the lines are being blurred again. I mean, materialistically speaking, there&#039;s no difference at all. And that&#039;s the point of my &quot;Barbie&quot; post, isn&#039;t it? 

@Lene-chan: Hahaha, r u sure you’re not taking a time-machine into the wrong direction? (Forward?)… Aww, thanx for catching up! Haha, roomies with Coco-chan and Mimi-chan! So tell the truth, who snored louder? Did Mimi-chan rant against “K-On” in her sleep again? LOL. Hey, what? Burning? Ohhh, I had to look it up. The theme song, lol. ^o^

P.S. Heyyy, u too? Now *your* cross-posting comments are confusing me! Haha, thanx! Although with her RSS comment feeds, Jenn-chan politely suggested that I didn&#039;t have to go thru the cross-posting trouble anymore, lol. Awww. At least, u still don&#039;t mind. Yet, lol... Wait. Just weeks to roam the otakusphere? Why just weeks? &gt;_&lt;;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Coco-chan: Ahh, interesting. Didn&#8217;t know Japanese Dollfie collectors all referred to their dolls as &#8220;daughters&#8221;. Hmm, whether or not the connotation is different, as the Dollfie community continues to expand, should I begin to call my anime figures &#8220;daughters&#8221; too? Hehe, like I told Jenn-chan immediately above, if not &#8220;daughters&#8221;, couldn&#8217;t I call them &#8220;sisters&#8221; too?&#8230; Haha, yeah, recycled articles are always confusing. Referring to them as past articles is okay, but don&#8217;t need to automatically alter the date every year, lol&#8230; Ah, true, if u visit and know Melonpan more than the occasional visitor, you&#8217;d probably know it was a prank. But as I&#8217;ve noted before, with &#8220;doll daughters&#8221; and &#8220;figure drilling&#8221;, more and more shocking stuff is getting more and more acceptable. Which could be okay. Or not-so-okay, lol&#8230; Yup, I agree, the line between &#8220;doll&#8221; and &#8220;figure&#8221; definitely seems arbitrary, according to social norms and perceptions. So far, &#8220;clothing&#8221; and &#8220;dressing up&#8221; seem to be the sharpest distinction. But with these emerging Dollfies, the lines are being blurred again. I mean, materialistically speaking, there&#8217;s no difference at all. And that&#8217;s the point of my &#8220;Barbie&#8221; post, isn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>@Lene-chan: Hahaha, r u sure you’re not taking a time-machine into the wrong direction? (Forward?)… Aww, thanx for catching up! Haha, roomies with Coco-chan and Mimi-chan! So tell the truth, who snored louder? Did Mimi-chan rant against “K-On” in her sleep again? LOL. Hey, what? Burning? Ohhh, I had to look it up. The theme song, lol. ^o^</p>
<p>P.S. Heyyy, u too? Now *your* cross-posting comments are confusing me! Haha, thanx! Although with her RSS comment feeds, Jenn-chan politely suggested that I didn&#8217;t have to go thru the cross-posting trouble anymore, lol. Awww. At least, u still don&#8217;t mind. Yet, lol&#8230; Wait. Just weeks to roam the otakusphere? Why just weeks? >_<;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
